Menu

Archive of Past Issues


Resistant Arthropods Database


Ask an Expert about Resistance Issues



Information for Libraries



Submission Information


Pest Management Laboratory



Mission Statement



Contact Us




Resistant Pest Management Newsletter Home Page



Site designed by:
Erin A. Gould

 

 


Discriminating Dose Technique for Monitoring Insecticide Resistance in India

R. Ayyasamy and A.. Regupathy
Department of Agricultural Entomology
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University
Coimbatore- 641003

INTRODUCTION More than 75 per cent of the insecticides used in cotton are being targeted towards H. armigera. Of which, synthetic pyrethroids constitute 50 to 70 per cent. In India, farmers even apply 36 to 40 rounds of pesticides to the cotton crop of a duration of 150-180 days in a single season i.e., one spray for every five days (Banerjee et al., 2000).

Sucking pests at times reduces the crop yield to the extent of 21.2Among the sap feeders aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover, leaf hopper, Amrasca devastans Distant, whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Gennadius and thrips, Thrips tabaci Lind. are important. Cotton growers in India depend heavily on synthetic pesticides to combat these sucking pests; at least 2-3 sprays are directed against sucking pests (Nagia et al., 1989; Lingappa et al., 2001; Anonymous, 1999).

Rice leaffolders generally considered once as pests of minor nature have increased in abundance and have assumed second pest status next to brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal.). The loss estimation indicated as high as 75 per cent in some areas. Among the four superficially similar species viz., C. medinalis, M. patnalis, Marasmia trapezalis Gn. and Marasmia ruralis (Walker), C. medinalis and M. trapezalis Gn were very common occur together in rice growing areas .

Diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (L.) is a serious pest of crucifers especially cabbage, cauliflower and mustard.

Coffee occupies a place of pride among plantation crops grown in India. Coffee green bug, Coccus viridis (Green) is a serious pest of coffee and shade trees in coffee plantations.

Tobacco caterpilaar, Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) is a poly phagous pest and is a destructive pest of wide ranging crops like, cotton, tomato, chilies, groundnut, cabbage, cauliflower etc. Wide range of insecticides including pyrethroids areused to manage this pest.

Cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum Maton) is known as queen of spices.

Considerable damage is done by thrips Sciothrips cardamomi (Ramk.), shoot and capsule borer Conogethes punctiferalis Guen.

NEED FOR MONITORING In view of the serious nature of above mentioned pests, usage of pesticides on cotton, rice, cole vegetables, cardamom and coffee is both extensive and intensive. The repeated application of pesticides provides ample scope for the development of resistance.

Improved monitoring of resistance would decrease the number of ineffective pesticide applications that are made when a resistance problem exists but has not been diagnosed.

Though field control failure might be due to insecticide resistance, all field control failures need not be due to resistance. It might be due to improper application and spurious material especially in India with marginal holdings and low rate of literacy. To detect the resistance in any case of field control, baseline data on the sociability and method of detection are needed.. The information available on base- line data generated for the widely used insecticides in the control of these pests are compiled and presented for ready reference.

MONITORING METHODS The host specific monitoring methods identified will enable everyone to watch for the same signs that resistance problem may be occurring and the severity of the problem.

1. H.armigera: In the monitoring programme carried out (Regupathy et al., 2004) the discriminating doses for fenvalerate, cypermethrin, quinalphos, profenofos and endosulfan have been fixed using the susceptible cultures available in Australia for topical application method (Forrester and Cahill, 1987; Forrester et. al., 1993; Gunning et al., 1984) (Table 1. ). The high-tech nature of topical application prevents many field level workers and marginal farmers adopting this due to low literacy rate in India.

In the absence of susceptible strain of Helicoverpa armigera in India, indirect method was used to fix discriminating doses (DD) for other methods of bioassay viz., vial, bouquet, spray tower and larval dip for commonly used insecticides viz., endosulfan, quinalphos, chlorpyriphos, fenvalerate and cypermethrin (Gouthaman,1994; Gouthaman and Regupathy, 2003). The DD for other methods were extrapolated by multiplying the DD available for susceptible cultures of NRI, UK and Australia by topical application with the factor of ratio of LD99 of topical and other methods. Validation of extrapolated DDs was done by testing on different H. armigera populations. The extrapolated DDs inflicted mortality with standard error (SE) varying from 3.9 to 7.1 when batches of 50 insects were used. The variation could be reduced with more number of insects per test.

2. P. xylostella: The leaf dip (IRAC method No.7) was used to determine the variability in baseline susceptible response to Bt in DBM field populations. Appropriate discrimination dose of Biobit 50 WP (32000 IU/mg) for third instar was 18 ppm a.i. (99% kill) (Chandrasekaran and Regupathy, 1996 a).

Discriminating doses for carbosulfan, cartap hydrochloride, fenvalerate, monocrotophos and quinalphos were fixed for different methods of bioassay viz., vial, leaf dip, larval dip and spray tower (Table 2). (Chandrasekaran, 1994; Chandrasekaran and Regupathy, 1996 b,c). The larval dip assay, though easier and economical dose not facilitate treatment in batches as the larvae get clumped up. Therefore, vial assay is suggested for adoption.

3. S. litura: The base line susceptibility response to five commonly used insecticides viz., endosulfan, chlorpyrifos, profenofos, fenvalerate and deltamethrin in Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) was determined by topical application as per standard Heliothis susceptibility test recommended by Entomological Society of America. Third instar larvae weighing about 30-40 mg (approximately 12±0.5 mm length) 8±1d old, were used. The discriminating dose screen was fixed for monitoring the level of insecticide resistance (Niranjankumar, 1999; Niranjankumar and Regupathy, 2001 a,b. (Table 3).

4. C. medinalis and M. patnalis: The bioassay method described by Endo and Masuda (1981b) and Fabeller et al. (1988) was followed to determine DD insecticide resistance topical application of insecticides in an aliquot of 0.5 ul on fourth instar larva weighing 20-30 mg, Based on the susceptibility nature of different populations l of C. medinalis and M. patnalis s to different insecticides , the DDs arrived for the five different insecticides were: chlorpyriphos 1.00µg, monocrotophos 0.35µg, phosalone 1.90 µg phosphamidon5.50 µg and quinalphos 0.40 µg. (Anandan, 1997; Anbalagan,2001).

5. C. punctiferalis: Topical assay by applying insecticide in an aliquot of 1µl on C. punctiferalis larvae weighing 18 - 22 mg (length 1.2 cm) . Considering the LD95 , the tentative DD is fixed as 0.4µg.

6. H. antonii: The technique recommended by the FAO for detecting resistance to insecticides was used (Muhamed and Omar, 1997) with fourth instar nymphs. Considering the LC95 , the tentative DD is fixed as 50 ppm (Renuka, 2001).

7. A.gossypii : The baseline susceptibility data were generated. (Praveen, 2003; Praveen and Regupathy, 2003 a) adopting IRAC method No. 8. The wingless adults aphids of ca 1.45mm size and weighing ca 0.19mg were used. Based on LC95s of the insecticides, the discriminating doses (ppm) fixed were 10 for thiamethoxam, 20 for imidacloprid, 50 for dimethoate, 400 for methyl demeton, 40 for acephate, and 20 for monocrotophos.

8. T. tabaci: Leaf dip bioassay method used by Elbert and Nauen, 1996 was followed using second instar nymphs. (Praveen, 2003; Praveen and Regupathy, 2003 b).

The LC95 values obtained for Kumbakonam population were used as (Thanjavur Dist) considering the nil background exposure of thrips population in Kumbakonam and high susceptible nature and the following DD screen is suggested for future resistance monitoring for imidacloprid (0.7 ppm), thiamethoxam (1.0 ppm) and dimethoate (1000.0 ppm).

9. A. devastans: The base line data for A. devastans population to different insecticides was genereted following IRAC method No. 8. The DD screen was fixed considering F4 of Coimbatore population for thiamethoxam (0.008) and monocrotophos (0.55) and DD) for imidacloprid (0.005), dimethoate (400), methyl demeton (800) and acephate (850) (Jayapradeepa, 2000; Jeyapradeepa and Regupathy, 2002).

10. B.tabaci. The resistance frequency of B. tabaci population to various insecticides is monitored using DD screens following the method suggested by Elbert and Nauen (1996). The DD screen followed by PAU, Ludhiana (Regupathy et al., 1998) for seven different insecticides viz., thiamethoxam (10), imidacloprid (10), monocrotophos (100), acephate (100), triazophos (10), cypermethrin (50) and endosulfan (5) was used.

11. C. viridis: Baseline toxicity of thiamethoxam, imidacloprid and dimethoate to Coccus viridis (Green) by conducting acute toxicity studies by leaf dip assay. Discriminating doses of 35, 66 and 500 ppm were fixed for thiamethoxam, imidacloprid and dimethoate respectively (Senthilkumar, 2003: Senthilkumar and Regupathy 2004).

CONCLUSION Traditional monitoring involves comparisons of LD50s , LD90s or the dose response curves between susceptible and field poulations. DD technique is efficient in detecting low frequencies of resistance because all individuals are tested at an appropriate dose and none was wasted at lower doses.

REFERENCES

Anandan, G.K. 1997. Studies on insecticide resistance in rice leaf folder, Cnapholocrocis medinalis Guenee. M.Sc. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.161p.

Anbalagan. G. 2001. Studies on insecticide resistance in rice leaf folder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee. Ph.D. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.161p.

Anonymous. 1999. Crop Production Guide. Directorate of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai-5

Armes, N.J., S.K. Banerjee, K.R. Desouza, D.R. Jadhav, A.B.S. King, K.R. Kranti and A. Regupathy, T. Surilivelu and R. Venugopal Rao. 1994. Insecticide resistance in 3Helicoverpa armigera in India. Recent development. In: Brighton Crop Protection Conference pests and Diseases. British Crop Protection Council, Farmham, Survey, U.K. pp. 437-442.

Banerjee, S.K., K.S.Turkar and R.R. Wanjari. 2000. Evaluation of newer insecticides for the control of bollworms in cotton. Pestology, 24(8): 14-16.

Chandrasekaran, J. 1994. Studies on the insecticide resistance in diamond back moth Plutella xylostella (L.). Ph.D. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.161p.

Chandrasekaran, J. and A. Regupathy, 1996c. Baseline data for field monitoring of Bacillus thuringiensis resistance in Tamil Nadu (India) on Plutella xylostella (L.) population. In: III International workshop on the management of diamondback moth and other crucifer pests. Oct. 29-Nov.1, 1996, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, p. 332-334.

Chandrasekaran, J. and A. Regupathy. 1996a. Insecticide resistance in DBM, Plutella xylostella Lin. in India. Discriminating dose studies In: 20th International Congress of Entomology, Firenze, Italy, Aug. 25-31, Abst. 19-067p.602

Chandrasekaran, J. and A. Regupathy. 1996b. Status of insecticide resistance in field population of diamond back moth (DBM) Plutella xylostella in Tamil Nadu. IPM & sustain Agric-an Ent. Appr. 6: 95-99.

Elbert, A. and R. Nauen. 1996. Bioassays for imidacloprid for resistance monitoring against the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci. In: Brighton Crop Protection Conference: Pests & Diseases - 1996: Volume 2: Proc. Int. Conf., Brighton, UK, Nov' 18-21, 1996. pp. 731-738.

Endo, S. and T. ~Masuda. 1981b. Evaluation of insecticides applied to rice plant for control of rice leaf roller Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee. Proc. Assoc. Plant Prot., Kyushu. 27: 87-89.

Fabellar, LT., O. Kilin, S. Endo, S. Sivasubramaniam, D.K. Nagia, W. Cen, X. Tian, P. Kenmore, R.P. Basilio and O. Mochida. 1988. Monitoring susceptibility of rice pests to insecticides. IRRN, 13: 24-25.

Forrester, N.W. and M. Cahill. 1987. Management of insecticide resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in Australia. In: Ford, M., D.W. Holloman, B.P.S. Khambay and R.M. Sawicki (eds.) Combating Resistance to Xenobiotics: Biological and Chemical Approaches. Ellis Horwood, U.K., pp. 127 - 137.

Forrester, N.W., M. Cahill, L.J. Bird and J.K. Layland. 1993. Management of pyrethroid and endosulfan resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Australia. Bull. Ent. Res. Suppl., No.1: 132 p.

Gavi Gowda and A. Regupathy. 1995. Pyrethroid synergism with vegetable oils. Pod borer Management Newsletter, 6: 7.

Gavi Gowda and A. Regupathy. 1996. Potential use for Pongamia oil as an adjuvant with pyrethroid insecticides. Pod borer Management Newsletter, 7: 7.

Gouthaman, S. 1994. Studies on monitoring technique for detecting insecticide resistance in Helicoverpa (Heliothis) armigera(Hub). M.Sc. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.161p.

Gouthaman, S. and A. Regupathy. 2003. Monitoring Techniques for Detecting Insecticide Resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Resistant Pest Management Newsletter 13(1.) 38-41. Gouthaman, S. and A. Regupathy.. (Presented and abstract in XIII. International Plant protection Congress, 1995. In: European Journal of Plant Pathology Abs. July 2-7, 1995, The Hague, The Nether lands.)

Gunning, R.V., C.S. Easton, L.R. Greenup and V.E. Edge. 1984. Pyrethroid resistance in Heliothis armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Australia. J. Econ. Entomol., 77: 1283 - 1287.

Jayapradeepa, S. 2000. Studies on insecticide resistance in cotton leaf hopper, Amrasca devastans D. M.Sc. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.161p.

Jeyapradeepa, S. and A. Regupathy. 2002 Generating base line data for Insecticide Resistance Monitoring in Cotton Leafhopper, Amrasca devastans (Distant) Resistant Pest Management Newsletter 11(2):1-6.

Lavanya, D. 2004. Studeis on the susceptibility of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera : Plutellidae) on cabbage the insecticides of new chemistry (special reference to Avermectins. M.Sc. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India, 59p.

Lingappa, S., S.S. Udikeri and R.N. Hegde. 2001. Field evaluation of deltamethrin formulations (Decis Tab and 1.8 EC) against cotton insect pests. Pestology, 25(2): 12-14.

Muhamed, R. and D. Omar. 1997. Susceptibility of the cocoa mirid Helopeltis theivora (Water-House) to Gamma-HCH, cypermethrin and deltamethrin. Resist. Pest Mgmt., 9(1) : 34-37.

Nagia, D.K., M.L. Saini, S.P. Sharma and Sanjay Kumar. 1989. Bioassay of residual toxicity of a few organophosphorous, organochlorine and synthetic pyrethroids using cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover on cotton. J. Aphidology, 3 (1&2): 143-147.

Niranjan Kumar, B.V. and A. Regupathy. 2000. Generating baseline data for insect resistant monitoring in S. litura (Fab.). Pestic. Res. J. 12(2): 232-234.

Niranjankumar, B.V. 1999. Studies on insecticide resistance in Spodoptera litura Fab. M.Sc. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.161p.

Niranjankumar, B.V. and A. Regupathy, 2001b. Resistance levels of tobacco cutworm, Spodoptera litura (F.) to different insecticides in south India In: International Conference on Pesticides, Environment, and Food security. 19-23, November, 2001. Society of Pesticide Science India, IARI, New Delhi. p 271-272.

Niranjankumar, B.V. and A. Regupathy. 2001a. Status of Insecticide Resistance in tobacco caterpillar Spodoptera litura (Fab). in Tamil Nadu. Pestic. Res. J., 13(1): 86-89.

Praveen P. M. and A. Regupathy. 2003a. Generating baseline data for insecticide resistance monitoring in cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover Resist. Pest Mgmt.,.12 (2)

Praveen, P.M. and A. Regupathy. 2003b. Insecticide resistance in field Populations of cotton thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman in major cotton growing regions of Tamil Nadu. Pestic.Res. J 15(2): 197-200, December, 2003.

Praveen, P.M. 2003. Studies on insecticide resistance In early season sucking pests of cotton in Tamil Nadu. Ph.D. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.161p

Regupathy, A., D. Yadhav, S.K. Kapoor, D. Singh, K. Kranthi and D. Russel. 1998. Patterns of insecticide resistance across India in Helicoverpa armigera and Bemisia tabaci. In: World Cotton Research Conference - II. Sept' 6-12, 1998, Athens, Greece. Abst. p. 178.

Regupathy, A., Keshav Kranthi, Joginder Singh Arif Iqbal Yidong wu Derrek Russell. 2004. Patterns of Resistance levels in India, Pakistan and China. Proc. World Cotton Research Conference 3, 9-13, March, 2003, Cape Town, South Africa, 1215 -29.

Renuka, S. 2001. Studies on the bioefficacy and dissipation of profenofos applied on cardamom and cashew. Ph.D. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.131p.

Renuka, S. and A. Regupathy. 1996. Monitoring of insecticide resistance in diamond back moth Plutella xylostella. Pestic. Res. J., 8(2): 168-171.

Senthil Kumar, C. M. 2003. Diversity of Lecanicillium (=Verticillium) lecanii (Zimmermann) Viégas and spiders in coffee ecosystem applied with thiamethoxam. Ph.D. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.161p.

Senthil Kumar, C.M. and A. Regupathy. 2004. Generating base line data for insecticide resistance monitoring in coffee green scale, Coccus viridis (Green). Resist. Pest Mgmt. 13(5-6).

Stanley, J. 2004. Studies on base line toxicity of Emamectin and Spinosad to Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) and Spodoptera litura (Fab.) and their bio-efficacy on brinjal fruit borers. M.Sc. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India

Sujatha, D. 1994. Studies on the development of resistance to carbofuran, phosphamidon and neem oil in rice BPH, Nilaparvata lugens Stal. M.Sc. (AG). Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.

Sujatha. D. and A. Regupathy. 2003. Development of resistance to carbofuran, phosphamidon and neem oil in Rice BHP, Nilaparvata lugens Populations in Tamil Nadu, India. Pesticide Research Journal Vol. 15(2): 194-197, ( Paper presented and extended abstract In: International Conference of Integrated approaching to combating resistance, April, 14-16, 1997, Harpenden, Herts UK, P.126.)

 

 

 

Supported By:


Center for Integrated Plant Systems

Michigan State University

Insecticide Resistance Action Committee

United States Department of Agriculture CSREES

Editors:
Mark E. Whalon

Robert M. Hollingworth


Area Editors:


Plant Pathology
Margaret Tuttle McGrath

Herbicide
Jonathan Gressel


Newsletter Coordinator


Maintained by:
Theresa A. Baker