Menu

Archive of Past Issues


Resistant Arthropods Database


Ask an Expert about Resistance Issues



Information for Libraries



Submission Information


Pest Management Laboratory



Mission Statement



Contact Us




Resistant Pest Management Newsletter Home Page



Site designed by:
Erin A. Gould

 

 


Resistance Management Reviews

Fire Ant Behavior - A Guide for Control
By Dr. Terry Mabbett

Research at Imperial College, University of London is helping to tame one of North America's most feared and loathsome public health pests. Red imported fire ant (IFA) (Solenopsis invicta Buren), introduced from South America 70 years ago and currently infesting 250-300 million acres in eleven southern states are fierce, territorial, and persistent. Each fire ant nest may contain up to 3000 'queens' that offer enormous reproductive potential. Throughout spring and summer, active mounds send out 'swarmer' ants (wingless males and females) that start new colonies. These are established in a wide variety of environments including picnic area, playgrounds, pool areas, and around buildings at home and at work. Fire ants deliver a nasty sting - capable of killing hypersensitive people - and as such are a priority target for North American pest control operators (PCOs).

The red IFA also disrupts a wide range of agricultural operations. Reports of attacks on livestock including piglets, new-born calves, and chicks are widespread as is crop damage from ants gnawing holes in roots, stems and buds of a wide range of crops. Red IFA mounds disrupt crop harvesting leaving farmers with two unsatisfactory options: to push the mounds over with plowing equipment, reducing yield and risking equipment damage, or to avoid the mounds, reducing the area of the harvested crop.

Control by insecticide baiting of mounds relies on worker ants bringing back active material into the nest to ensure that the queen(s) die. Many factors including heavy rain, poor bait placement, and bait shyness may conspire to cause control failure. Gordon Daly (postgraduate student on the MSc Pest Management Course at Imperial College, Silwood Park, England) looked at red imported fire ants management from an altogether different angle. Using four different synthetic pyrethroid insecticides - lambda cyhalothrin, deltamethrin, bifenthrin, and betacyfluthrin - he evaluated the magnitude and consequences of perceived fire ant repulsion and activated behaviorial responses following contact with these insecticides.

Fire ants react with a 'hot coals' response, which involves the ants walking up to the deposit of insecticide and promptly retiring. Research is underway to determine the nature of this behavior and to evaluate whether positive results, such as keeping fire ants away from buildings, are outweighed by potentially negative effects. It is suspected that a reduced exposure time of worker ants to insecticide deposit means they will fail to pick up a lethal dose of insecticide and carry it back to the nest. To examine the pesticide exposure of ants within the colony, Daly looked at the role of other ants in the nest. The necrophytic/necrophagic ants remove those that have died of insecticide poisoning and place them outside the nest. If insecticide is intended to reach ants resident in the nest, including nurse ants, larvae, and queens, it is crucial for the insecticide deposit to be acquired from the cadavers and passed up the 'chain of command' to the queen.

The sequence of events, observed and recorded by Gordon Daly, which describe the response of red IFA workers to residual deposits to synthetic pyrethroid insecticides are as followes:

  • When individual ants approach insecticide-treated surfaces they are not repelled and subsequently move onto the surface where they acquired a lethal dose, providing that the time of exposure is sufficiently long.

  • If the ant remains on the deposit for a period of 30 seconds or more then knockdown will occur between 13 and 16 minutes later, depending on the active ingredient. Longer exposure periods hasten knockdown. Exposure to insecticide may induce activation behavior or inhibition behavior in the ant, depending on the formulation encountered.

  • During post-exposure periods the ant may act as a vector of the insecticide by transferring active ingredient to the other individuals of the colony via physical contact. This will continue even after the ant has died because nest mates, exhibiting necrophoric* behavior, will remove the corpse from the nest. (*This term is used to distinguish the disposal of corpses from other sanitation tasks, which serve the hygiene of the colony as a while.) The individuals involved in the corpse removal will then pick up a lethal dose and distribute it further within the colony.

  • Corpses will initially transfer toxicity more rapidly to other individuals than do contaminated, live ants. However, the end result in terms of maximum knockdown and mortality will be the same. In addition, toxicity may be transferred from a live individual to another via behavioral activities such as nest mate recognition or food begging.

Control of most public health and agricultural pests with synthetic pyrethroid insecticides is straightforward. Individuals pick up lethal doses of the contact and stomach-acting neurotoxins and die. These individual events contribute directly to insect pest control through the erosion of the reproductive potential of the population. The control situation with colony-forming insects such as fire ants is more complex and difficult. Control relies on an understanding of the social behavior patterns of these insects to ensure that insecticide reaches the 'nerve centre' of the colony and kills the queen(s). The work reported here takes a significant step forward in understanding fire ant behavior in relation to the use of synthetic pyrethroid 'chemistry' and in how it can be harnessed for control of this fierce insect pest.

For further information and details, contact:

Dr. Terry Mabbett
Dr. Terry Mabbett Consultants
2 Albemarle Avenue
Potters Bar, Herts EN6 1TD
United Kingdom
Tel/Fax: +44 (0) 1707 644953
E-mail: DrTerryMabbett@btinternet.com

OR

Dr. Denis Wright
Department of Biology Imperial College at Silwood Park
Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY
United Kingdom
Tel/Fax: +44 (0) 1344 294339
E-mail: dwright@ic.ac.uk

 

 

 

Supported By:


Center for Integrated Plant Systems

Michigan State University

Insecticide Resistance Action Committee

United States Department of Agriculture CSREES

Editors:
Mark E. Whalon

Robert M. Hollingworth


Area Editors:


Plant Pathology
Margaret Tuttle McGrath

Herbicide
Jonathan Gressel


Newsletter Coordinator


Maintained by:
Theresa A. Baker